![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Status: Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 211
|
One of the most important areas of application of basic economic and financial analysis is to support the day-to-day decisions made by managers and staff. It is an operational part of the company, in which the strategic direction and operational plans will be translated into action.
Despite their importance, analytical practices in this area often, usually less developed, as the pressure of daily activities, the contract reflects the time to reflect on operational issues and compromises. Too busy to think impact on the bottom line decision harried manager or employee acting on the spur of the moment. Such a place-pants-decisions can become ingrained way of doing things, if the company has instilled a sense of discipline, major decisions and provided guidance with a simple but useful solutions, regulations and processes. Successful companies will include a set of indicators and benchmarks, as well as provide information which clearly supports intelligent decisions. Without such guidance, non-economic damages and choices such as spending, as there is room in the budget, either in the allowable decision to become a head count criteria. Operational efficiency should be a function of sound compromise, with careful cost management and close attention paid to quality and efficiency of production or services rendered, and with constant vigilance when serving clients through sustainable pricing, credit and support for action. The issue we are dealing here more than the availability of funds. We talk about mind set, the institutional environment in which managers and all employees are confident, really challenged, approach to their work and daily decisions they make with a rational compromise mentality. Before making decisions, the answers to questions such as "Is this really necessary cost and will it attract more cash than I will spend?" Or "Should I actually spend more because I'm waiting for opportunities to improve service pays off in higher profit contribution?" Should be second nature, as well as the discussions: Should I participate in this activity, or is it more economical to be carried out for the service?" Such thinking can run counter to corporate culture, which does not encourage employee initiative and "thinking outside the box", but would be a natural consequence of economic leadership of manager we discussed earlier. This is not breakable by combining training and support decision-making on specific and clearly communicated expectations at all levels.
__________________
malleshyavagal |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| forextalking, global finance, latest, tips. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|